Peran Antropolog dalam perencanaan pembangunan yang berbasis kearifan lokal

Mubarak Dahlan

Authors

Mubarak Dahlan Prodi Antropologi FIS-H, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Keywords:

antropolog, perencanaan, pembangunan, kearifan lokal, budaya

Abstract

This article aims to examine the strategic role of anthropologists in development planning based on local wisdom. Through a qualitative approach based on literature, this article finds that anthropologists make important contributions in several aspects. First, anthropologists act as cultural researchers who are able to identify, document, and analyze local wisdom as social capital for development. Second, anthropologists function as a communication bridge between development planners (government, private sector) and local communities, so that formulated policies are truly in line with local needs and contexts. Third, anthropologists act as mediators and facilitators in resolving potential conflicts that arise from clashes between development projects and local values. Fourth, anthropologists are involved in the process of evaluating the sociocultural impacts of a development project to ensure its sustainability. Thus, the involvement of anthropologists from the planning stage to the evaluation of development is not merely complementary, but rather a necessity for realizing equitable, participatory, inclusive, and sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadin, A. (2023). Public space as a tourism object: the existence of Pakui Sayang Park in Makassar City. Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin, 6(3), 220–225.

Berkes, F. (2018). Sacred ecology (4th ed.). Routledge.

Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press.

Dahlan, M. (2023). Pembangunan Sektor Pariwisata Berbasis Budaya Lokal di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Riset Pembangunan, 1(4).

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Djumaty, B. L., Primawati, Ahmadin, N. H., Afifah, I., Dey, N. P. H., Tubagus, S., Salim, K., Tambunan, A. A., Wijaya, M. H. D., & Yudawisastra,

H. G. (2025). Pengantar Sosiologi Konsep dan Praktik. Penerbit Widina.

Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Kottak, C. P. (2015). Cultural anthropology: Appreciating cultural diversity (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press. [Sebagaimana dikutip dalam Escobar, 2011]

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pemerintah Kota Surakarta. (2022). Laporan pembangunan berkelanjutan berbasis kearifan lokal di Surakarta. Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Kota Surakarta.

Rahman, A., Wirastika Sari, N. M., Fitriani, Sugiarto, M., Sattar, Abidin, Z., Irwanto, Nugroho, A. P., Indriana, Ladjin, N., Haryanto, E., Ode

Amane, A. P., Ahmadin, & Alaslan, A. (2022). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial. In Metode Pengumpulan Data (Klasifikasi, Metode Dan Etika). CV WIDINA MEDIA UTAMA.

Setiawan, B., & Haryanto, R. (2019). Desain partisipatif dan revitalisasi kampung kota: Studi kasus Kampung Pelangi dan Kampung

Bustaman Semarang. Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 30(1), 41–58.

Spradley, J. P. (2016). The ethnographic interview. Waveland Press. (Edisi bahasa Indonesia: Metode etnografi. Tiara Wacana)

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Zulkarnaen, T. A., Dahlan, M., & Ahmadin, M. (2022). Konstruksi Sosial, Budaya dan Ekonomi pada Pola Makan Masyarakat Kelurahan

Benteng Somba Opu Kabupaten Gowa. Jurnal Kajian Sosial Dan Budaya: Tebar Science, 6(2), 97–104.